In which we address the problem of yet another misogynistic loudmouth
In the latest instance of a male troglodyte holding forth on the finer social implications of rape, University of Rochester economics professor Steven Landsburg recently penned a brief manifesto on the rape convictions of two high school football players in Steubenville, Ohio, that would make any self-respecting woman-hater’s heart swell with testosterone-laden pride.
In his blog, Landsburg asked whether the law should rightfully discourage acts of rape in which the person is unconscious and suffers no direct physical harm. “As long as I’m safely unconscious and therefore shielded from the costs of an assault,” Landsburg reasons, “why shouldn’t the rest of the world (or more specifically my attackers) be allowed to reap the benefits?”
Groups such as Binders Full of Women and WORD (Women Organized to Resist and Defend) — as well as many students at the university — are outraged and have called for Landsburg’s ouster. The university, in true let’s-protect-the-macho-s*@theads-among-us fashion, has taken a self-righteous stand in support of its professor and his right to academic autonomy and free speech.
So I have a another solution to propose — and it’s one of which I am certain Landsburg himself would approve, since I am literally taking him at his own word.
So the good U of R doesn’t want to fire him outright? Fine. Then how about we invite Landsburg to the next dorm party, ply him with sufficient drugs and alcohol to render him safely unconscious and therefore shielded from the costs of an assault, and then surgically remove his man parts? After all, why shouldn’t the rest of the world be allowed to reap the benefits?
We won’t even need any sophisticated equipment. A magnifying glass and a pair of tweezers should do just fine.
3 responses to “A modest proposal”
”As long as I’m safely unconscious and therefore shielded from the costs of an assault,” Landsburg reasons, “why shouldn’t the rest of the world (or more specifically my attackers) be allowed to reap the benefits?”
This is disgusting. I wonder what professorship he holds besides economics? – Stupidity?
Does he have females in his family?
I got curious enough about your question to do a little “research,” Eric. (OK, actually, I Googled him and looked at the first result that popped up.) Apparently he’s built quite a reputation for himself by making very public and very inflammatory remarks on a whole host of things he may, or may not, know anything about. According to my unimpeachable source (which in this case was the ubiquitous Wikipedia), he has one daughter named Cayley.
Heaven help her.
He sounds like a media hungry troll – not worth our time.